Listing of High School & College Websites

So, I’ve been doing some marketing research for my upcoming book The Secrets of Top Students – formerly called The Valedictorian’s Guide – and I compiled a list of websites (and some print media) related to high school and college. This list is far from comprehensive, but I thought some people might find it useful. I categorized them as follows:

  1. College / General Education News & Advice
  2. College Admission Advice & Consultants
  3. Websites for Parents of High School/ College Students
  4. SAT Prep
  5. Scholarship/ Financial Aid Websites
  6. College Life Advice
  7. Websites for Online Education and Adults Going Back to School
  8. Miscellaneous
  9. Magazines & Newspapers for Students and Parents

Do you have a favorite education website not mentioned here?  Feel free to leave a reply below.

College / General Education News & Advice

http://www.usatodayeducate.com/staging/ [college advice, news]

http://www.collegeconfidential.com/ [college advice, forums]

http://www.studentadvisor.com/ [college advice, news]

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/college-admissions [college advice, news]

http://www.usnews.com/education [advice, rankings]

http://www.campusgrotto.com/ [college news, advice]

http://themash.com/ [advice for Chicago teens]

http://edudemic.com/ [articles about education, learning]

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/education/ [education news]

http://www.uloop.com/ [news and classifies for college students]

http://www.nextgenjournal.com/ [news for college students]

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/college/ [college news]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/campus-overload [college news]

http://www.ivygateblog.com/ [Ivy League news]

http://www.educationnation.com/ [from NBC News]

http://www.schoolbook.org/ [NYC school news]

http://campusbasement.com/ [college news]

http://learning.blogs.nytimes.com/ [articles for teachers, students]

http://chronicle.com/ [academics discuss education]


College Admission Advice & Consultants
(Note: many of these sites also have blogs on education issues)

http://www.student.com/ [admissions, college advice]

https://bigfuture.collegeboard.org/ [college planning, SAT prep]

http://talk.collegetocareers.com/ [admissions advice, forums]

www.schools.com [admissions advice, news]

http://myfootpath.com/ [advice for admissions, careers]

http://www.collegeview.com/index.jsp [admissions advice]

http://thechoice.blogs.nytimes.com/ [college admissions blog]

http://sbuchris.blogspot.com/ [admissions advice]

http://collegeapps.about.com/ [Allen Grove’s About.com college apps site]

http://blog.admissionpossible.com/ [admissions advice]

http://www.crandleconsulting.com/ [college consulting]

http://cc4therestofus.com/ [admissions counseling website]

http://www.sugarlandsat.com/ [admissions counseling website]

http://www.collegebasics.com/ [admissions advice]

http://www.nextstepu.com/ [admissions advice]

http://www.nhheaf.org/index.asp [admissions advice]

http://www.siaknight.com/ [college coach]

http://kerrigancollegeplanning.com/ [college consultant]

http://www.millereduconsulting.com/ [college consultant]

https://www.collegeadvisorycenter.com/ [college consultants]

http://internationalcollegecounselors.com/ [admissions counseling]

http://www.braintrack.com/ [admissions advice]

http://collegetidbits.com/wordpress/college-planning-blog/ [college planning]

http://usdegreesearch.com/ [school search/ consultants]

http://www.collegemapper.com/ [college consultants]

http://collegediscoveries.com/ [college consultant]

http://admissionado.com/ [college consultants]

http://www.collegeprimers.com/ [college consultants]

http://www.emersonec.com/ [college consultant]

http://www.collegesmartadvising.com/ [college consultant]

http://www.askjohnaboutcollege.com/askjohnaboutcollege/Ask_John_About_College.html [college consultant]

http://collegeconnection.yolasite.com/ [college consultants]

http://greatcollegeadvice.com/ [college consultants]

http://www.lucenteducation.com/ [college consultants]

http://www.collegebound.net/blog/ [college consultants]

http://www.collegiategateway.com/ [college consulting]

http://admissionsadvice.com/ [college consultant]


Websites for Parents of High School/ College Students

http://www.collegeparents.org/ [advice for parents]

https://www.teenlife.com/ [advice for parents of teens]

http://www.smartcollegevisit.com/ [help for visiting colleges]

http://www.yourcollegekid.com/ [advice for parents]

http://www.collegeparentcentral.com/ [advice for parents]

http://collegetipsforparents.org/

http://parentingteens.about.com/ [About.com site for parents of teens]

http://www.universityparent.com/

http://www.pta.org/ [national PTA]


SAT Prep

http://www.directhitseducation.com/ [SAT prep]

http://www.testrocker.com/ [SAT prep]

http://freetestprep.com/default.php [SAT prep]

http://www.scorebusters.com/ [SAT prep]


Scholarship/ Financial Aid Websites

http://www.scholarships360.org/ [scholarship help]

http://cheapscholar.org/ [financial advice for college]

http://how2winscholarships.com/

http://www.collegexpress.com/ [college scholarships and advice]


College Life Advice

http://www.hercampus.com/ [college, life advice for women]

http://www.mymajors.com/ [advice for choosing a major]

http://www.internqueen.com/ [for students in need of internships]

http://universitychic.com/ [advice for college women]

http://blog.campussplash.com/ [advice about colleges, college life]

http://collegelifestyles.org/ [lifestyle tips for college women]

http://talknerdy2me.org/campus-geek [college life blog]

http://www.collegecures.com/ [college life]

http://www.survivingcollege.com/ [college advice]

http://www.campustalkblog.com/ [college, learning advice]

http://www.hackcollege.com/ [college advice]

http://www.honestcollege.com/ [college and tech advice]

http://www.collegesurfing.com/blog/ [college advice]

http://www.universitylanguage.com/ [college advice]


Websites for Online Education and Adults Going Back to School

http://www.onlinedegrees.com/ [advice for online education]

http://www.back2college.com/ [advice for students returning to college]

http://www.backtolearn.com/ [advice for adults going back to school]

http://www.onlinecollege.org/blog/ [advice for online degrees]


Miscellaneous

http://www.usatodayeducate.com/staging/index.php/campus-newspapers-a-comprehensive-resource [a map with links to college newspapers]

http://academictips.org/ [academic advice]

http://community.simplek12.com/scripts/student/home.asp#cat0 [website, blog for teachers]

http://www.the21stcenturyteacher.com/ [site for teachers]

http://www.imfirst.org/ [advice for first generation college students]

http://highschoolmediator.com/ [high school ed expert]

http://ericsheninger.com/esheninger?sid=28 [education admin/ expert]

https://getschooled.com/ [site for high school students]

http://www.edtrust.org/ [advocacy for education]

http://www.edutopia.org/blogs [advice for educators]

http://www.verizonwireless.com/wcms/consumer/products/education-bundle.html [education tools and apps]


Magazines & Newspapers for Students and Parents

Girl’s Life [magazine for teen girls, http://www.girlslife.com/%5D

Justine [magazine for teen girls, http://www.justinemagazine.com/%5D

Seventeen Magazine

Working Mother Magazine [http://www.workingmother.com/]

Your Teen Magazine [http://yourteenmag.com/]

Education Update [NYC newspaper and website, www.EducationUpdate.com]

Manhattan Family [Newspaper and website, mostly for parents of younger kids but some stuff relating to teens, www.NYParenting.com]


Give your child the gift of great grades.  Order a copy of The Secrets of Top Students today!

Re: The Imaginary Teacher Shortage

There was an interesting opinion piece in The Wall Street Journal  today: “The Imaginary Teacher Shortage” by Jay Greene. Both Obama and Romney think we need more teachers, but as Greene notes:

For decades we have tried to boost academic outcomes by hiring more teachers, and we have essentially nothing to show for it. In 1970, public schools employed 2.06 million teachers, or one for every 22.3 students, according to the U.S. Department of Education’s Digest of Education Statistics. In 2012, we have 3.27 million teachers, one for every 15.2 students. Yet math and reading scores for 17-year-olds have remained virtually unchanged since 1970, according to the U.S. Department of Education’s National Assessment of Educational Progress.

That study Greene refers to can be found here. Interestingly, while scores for high school students haven’t changed, scores for nine- and thirteen-year-olds have improved. It’s also worth noting that the pupil to teacher ratio depends on what kind of school we’re talking about. According to the National Center for Education Statistics, “the public school pupil/teacher ratio was 15.4 in 2009. By comparison, the pupil/teacher ratio for private schools was estimated at 12.5 in 2009. The average class size in 2007–08 was 20.0 pupils for public elementary schools and 23.4 pupils for public secondary schools.”

While I agree that hiring more teachers isn’t necessarily the solution to our education problem, I disagree with Greene’s proposed alternative: using more technology in classrooms to allow for “more individualized instruction with many fewer teachers.” I don’t think that letting young students sit for hours in front of a computer screen, with teachers serving merely as “tutors, problem-solvers, and behavior managers,” is the answer. What do you think?


 

Want to improve your grades?   Order your copy of The Secrets of Top Students today!

Education News: Recommended Articles

From college rankings to kids sticking themselves with IVs to study longer, here are some education stories you might enjoy:

NPR story about How Children Succeed: Grit, Curiosity and the Hidden Power of Character, by Paul Tough. I love his name, by the way – very appropriate. This book sounds great and it speaks to all the things I’ve been saying recently. Academic achievement (and achievement in life) depends on hard work and perseverance, not talent and luck.

The College Rankings Racket, by Joe Nocera. Are college rankings really a racket? I think that’s going a little too far. Mr. Nocera’s article links to U.S. News‘s description of how they rank schools, and it sounds pretty legit to me. Sure, some kids place too much pressure on themselves to go to certain schools, but that doesn’t mean the rankings are pointless. What do you think?

Chinese students use IV amino acids to study for high-stakes tests, by Valerie Strauss. Apparently some high school students in China receive IV drips of amino acids so they can better prepare for the high-stakes college entrance exams. I feel sorry for these kids.

7 Questions to Ask Yourself When Choosing a Major. This is a great article for all you college students out there. The last question may be the most important: Is this what I want or what someone else wants?


Give yourself the gift of great grades.  Order your copy of The Secrets of Top Students today!

What’s the point of a college education?

There have been a lot of articles questioning the value of a college education recently – particularly the value of a liberal arts education. Take, for example, Frank Bruni’s The Imperiled Promise of College and Michelle Singletary’s Not All College Majors Are Created Equal. These articles warn against choosing majors that tend to result in low-paying jobs (or no jobs at all). That’s why I was glad to read Alina Tugend’s article Vocation or Exploration? Pondering the Purpose of College, which argues that college students can and should study the humanities. As Ms. Tugend writes, the question is this: is the purpose of college to “ensure a good job after graduation,” or “to give students a broad and deep humanities education that teaches them how to think and write critically? Or can a college education do both?” I’m going with door number three.

In the article, Ms. Tugend notes that what students major in has a greater impact on their future earnings than in previous decades.

So does that mean I should urge our son to pursue a degree he doesn’t have any interest in because it may provide him with a higher-paying job — or any job, for that matter — after college?

No, Professor Carnevale said, because if you don’t like what you do, you won’t do it well. The point is that “young people now need to have a strategy,” he said. “If you major in art, realize you will have to get a master’s degree. The economic calculus has changed.”

I like that line – if you don’t like what you do, you won’t do it well.

When I was in college, my most rewarding classes were in the humanities. I specialized in medieval history and got an M.A. in Art History before I majored and got a job in Computer Science. Do I regret studying history and art history, where job options are extremely limited? Not in the least. I’m glad I have a background in the humanities – I think it makes me a more well-rounded, knowledgeable, appreciative person. (However, I’m lucky that I didn’t go into debt to get my degrees. If I did owe lots of money, perhaps I wouldn’t be so pro-liberal arts.) One of the best things about Columbia, my alma mater, is that it has a Core Curriculum. All undergrads, no matter what their major, are required to take classes like Literature Humanities and Contemporary Civilization, where they have literally hundreds of pages of reading each week on everything from Homer to Dante to Freud. This was probably the highlight of my academic career.

Lastly, I was quoted in a Crain’s New York Business article last week – Goodbye, ‘bamboo ceiling’ – Corporate barriers spur Asian-Americans to start fast-growing enterprises, by Emily Laermer.

When Stefanie Weisman was Stuyvesant’s valedictorian in 1999, she said, the school was about half Asian. She described her time there as ‘the most intense four years of my life’ because of its competitiveness.

‘The students there are bright and hardworking, partly because there are so many Asian-American students,” she said, citing the influence of ‘tiger parents.’ . . . .

It’s also possible that tiger parenting ultimately backfires. Ms. Weisman, who is writing a book about academic success, said that those who enjoy learning – rather than studying because their parents insist – tend to do better professionally.


Give yourself the gift of great grades.  Order your copy of The Secrets of Top Students today!

The Black and the Gold: Computer Science Courses at Harvey Mudd College

I just read a very interesting piece in The New York Times about Maria Klawe, the president of Harvey Mudd College. Dr. Klawe and her colleagues have been trying to increase the number of female college students majoring in Computer Science – currently only 18% of CS undergrads are women. Here’s one of their initiatives:

In 2005, the year before Dr. Klawe arrived, a group of faculty members embarked on a full makeover of the introductory computer science course, a requirement at Mudd.

Known as CS 5, the course focused on hard-core programming, appealing to a particular kind of student — young men, already seasoned programmers, who dominated the class. This only reinforced the women’s sense that computer science was for geeky know-it-alls.

“Most of the female students were unwilling to go on in computer science because of the stereotypes they had grown up with,” said Zachary Dodds, a computer scientist at Mudd. “We realized we were helping perpetuate that by teaching such a standard course.”

To reduce the intimidation factor, the course was divided into two sections — “gold,” for those with no prior experience, and “black” for everyone else. Java, a notoriously opaque programming language, was replaced by a more accessible language called Python. And the focus of the course changed to computational approaches to solving problems across science.

“We realized that we needed to show students computer science is not all about programming,” said Ran Libeskind-Hadas, chairman of the department. “It has intellectual depth and connections to other disciplines.”

I really like the idea of having “black” classes for advanced students and “gold” classes for beginners, as a way of encouraging more women to go into computer science. (Plus calling it gold makes it sound better!) When I studied CS in college, I was intimidated not by the fact that the vast majority of my classmates were male, but that they had way more experience than I did. I had never even coded a “Hello world” program before, while they had been playing around with programming languages and taking computers apart since they were kids, or at least since high school. It was a huge challenge to keep up with them.

However, I also felt that my intro CS classes were much more accessible than my advanced classes, which catered even more to seasoned – and mostly male – programmers. I don’t think it would be enough to offer separate intro classes for experienced and novice students, and then throw them all together the next semester. I wonder if and how this extra support for inexperienced CS students could be continued after the intro level. I, for one, wanted a much greater variety of CS courses than were offered at Columbia. In my view, there were too many theory courses and not enough practical ones. There also weren’t enough courses that showed different ways technology could be used in society. How do you think women should be encouraged to go into computer science?

Also of interest – Ivy League acceptance rates hit an all time low this year. At Harvard, for example, it’s only 5.9%! I have two things to say about this: (1) The rise of electronic applications means that more under-qualified applicants have been applying to top schools, potentially skewing the results. (2) There are plenty of good schools out there, so don’t stress if you can’t go to an Ivy League. You’ll do fine as long as you choose a school that values education, lets you pursue your interests, and fits your budget. Good luck to all of those heading off to college next year!


Going to college?  Give yourself the gift of good grades with The Secrets of Top Students!

Hey all you teenage girls out there!

My study tips article “Get smart! Six ways to rock the end of the semester” is in the new issue of Girl’s Life Magazine! This is the first time I was able to walk into a Barnes & Noble and buy something with my name in it – and it’s a pretty cool feeling.

See where it says “Rock Finals!” on the right? That’s me!

In this article, I talk about easy things you can do to get better grades – things like taking naps, snacking during exams (if your teacher lets you, of course), and answering test questions out of order. In case you were wondering, I’ve used all the techniques I wrote about – and I wouldn’t have been a top student without them!

Happy studying, everyone!


Give yourself the gift of great grades.  Order your copy of The Secrets of Top Students today!

Thinking outside the box on education: 4 great books with a fresh new perspective

Some of the books with the most original, thought-provoking ideas about education these days aren’t even on education. They’re on subjects such as sociology, psychology, technology, and self-help, among others, but they challenge what’s going on in schools today. Here are some books that don’t fall into the category of education, but which have a lot to say about the way we learn.

1. Quiet: The Power of Introverts in a World That Can’t Stop Talking, by Susan Cain (Crown, 2012). This book is ammunition against a school system that increasingly views classroom education as an endless stream of group projects. While it’s important for kids to learn teamwork, all too often we forget the importance of solitude, concentration, and deep thought in the learning process. I know that when I was in school, I did my best work alone. As Ms. Cain writes:

What’s so magical about solitude? In many fields, Ericsson told me, it’s only when you’re alone that you can engage in Deliberate Practice, which he has identified as the key to exceptional achievement. When you practice deliberately, you identify the tasks or knowledge that are just out of your reach, strive to upgrade your performance, monitor your progress, and revise accordingly. Practice sessions that fall short of this standard are not only useful – they’re counterproductive. They reinforce existing cognitive mechanisms instead of improving them. Deliberate Practice is best conducted alone for several reasons. It takes intense concentration, and other people can be distracting. It requires deep motivation, often self-generated. But most important, it involves working on the task that’s most challenging to you personally. Only when you’re alone, Ericsson told me, can you “go directly to the part that’s challenging to you. If you want to improve what you’re doing, you have to be the one who generates the move. Imagine a group class – you’re the one generating the move only a small percentage of the time.” [page 81]

Another book about deliberate practice is Talent Is Overrated: What Really Separates World-Class Performers from Everybody Else, by Geoff Colvin (Portfolio Trade, 2010).

2. The Dumbest Generation: How the Digital Age Stupefies Young Americans and Jeopardizes Our Future (Or, Don’t Trust Anyone Under 30), by Mark Bauerlein. (New York: Penguin/Tarcher, 2008). The title says it all. Technology may be causing untold damage to the brains of young people. I’ve written two articles about avoiding the pitfalls of technology in education (see my piece in USA Today and the follow-up post on my blog). In this passage, Mr. Bauerlein paints a disturbing picture of this country’s rising generation of scholars:

Most young Americans possess little of the knowledge that makes for an informed citizen, and too few of them master the skills needed to negotiate an information-heavy, communication-based society and economy. Furthermore, they avoid the resources and media that might enlighten them and boost their talents. An anti-intellectual outlook prevails in their leisure lives, squashing the lessons of school, and instead of producing a knowledgeable and querulous young mind, the youth culture of American society yields an adolescent consumer enmeshed in juvenile matters and secluded from adult realities. [page 16]

There’s a book on a similar topic, The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains, by Nicholas Carr (W.W. Norton & Company, 2011), which I hope to read soon.

3. Outliers: The Story of Success, by Malcolm Gladwell (New York: Little, Brown and Company, 2008). In addition to talking about the 10,000 hour rule (the theory that it takes at least 10,000 hours of practice for someone to become an expert in something), Mr. Gladwell also discusses why Asian students often outperform their American peers, especially in science and math:

We should be able to predict which countries are best at math simply by looking at which national cultures place the highest emphasis on effort and hard work. So, which places are at the top of both lists? The answer shouldn’t surprise you: Singapore, South Korea, China (Taiwan), Hong Kong, and Japan. What those five have in common, of course, is that they are all cultures shaped by the tradition of wet-rice agriculture and meaningful work. They are the kinds of places where, for hundreds of years, penniless peasants, slaving away at the rice paddies three thousand hours a year, said things to one another like “No one who can rise before dawn three hundred sixty days a year fails to make his family rich.” [pages 247-49]

4. The 4-Hour Workweek, by Timothy Ferriss (Crown Archetype, 2009). This one may be a bit of a surprise. Am I suggesting that you can get great grades by working four hours a week? Not at all. Nor am I encouraging you to outsource your schoolwork to India. But Mr. Ferriss does present some useful advice on how to work more efficiently and effectively, whether you’re a student or an entrepreneur. Here’s an example:

Parkinson’s Law dictates that a task will swell in (perceived) importance and complexity in relation to the time allotted for its completion. It is the magic of the imminent deadline. If I give you 24 hours to complete a project, the time pressure forces you to focus on execution, and you have no choice but to do only the bare essentials. If I give you a week to complete the same task, it’s six days of making a mountain out of a molehill. . . . The end product of the shorter deadline is almost inevitably of equal or higher quality due to greater focus. . . . . There are two synergistic approaches for increasing productivity that are inversions of each other:

  1. Limit tasks to the important to shorten work time (80/20).
  2. Shorten work time to limit tasks to the important (Parkinson’s Law). [page 75]

What are some of your book recommendations?


Give yourself the gift of great grades.  Order your copy of The Secrets of Top Students today!